This blog is a repost of the one I wrote for Joan Lane's
All Dressed Up at
http://jplanewrites.blogspot.com/2012/05/cork-rump.html
In the first decade of the Georgian Era, bell-shaped skirts were all the rage. This silhouette was accomplished with hoops of whalebone or wood that were tied together in a cage around the waist. By mid-18th Century oblong or fan hoops called panniers (French for basket) spread a lady's skirts out at the sides. Proponents claimed this style made for ease of walking and kept importunate gentlemen at a distance. As always, however, such fashion came at a price; women were forced to turn sideways when they passed through doorways, and climbing into a coach was logistical nightmare. So in the last quarter of the century, the emphasis shifted from the hips to the rump.
Pads filled with fabric or cork were tied at the waist and draped over the derrière, poofing the skirt in the back. Cartoonists were quick to lambast this new "bum roll" or "cork rump" trend. (See the above 1787 print by S.F. Fores called A Milliner's Shop. A bum roll is hanging on the wall to the right of the mirror.) Typical of the ridicule was this print by Matthew
Darly from 1777 entitled Chloe’s Cushion
or The Cork Rump. (Notice the puppy perched on the back!)
Satirists like
Peter Pindar composed poems about the style. In 1815 he published The Cork Rump, or Queen and Maids of Honour. He’d already offered a backhanded
criticism of the fashion when he extolled the virtues of the common maid in his
1794 poem, The Louisad:
“With Nature’s
hips, she sighs not for cork rumps,
“And scorns the
pride of pinching stays and jumps;
“But, pleas’d
from whalebone prisons to escape,
“She trusts to
simple nature for a shape…”
Cork
rumps were a popular subject in newspapers and broadsheets as well. One
gentleman observed in the December 16, 1776 issue of The Weekly Miscellany:
“A
most ingenious author has made it a question, whether a man marrying a
woman…may not lawfully sue for divorce on the grounds that she is not the same
person? What with the enormous false head-dress—painting—and this newfangled
cork substitute—it would be almost impossible for a man to know his bride the
morning of his nuptials. If the ladies look on this invention as an ornament to
their symmetry, I will engage they shall be excelled by almost any Dutch
market-woman or fat landlady in this kingdom.”
There
is an account in History of the Westminster Election of a riot on May 10, 1784 in Covent Garden between
proponents of the three candidates standing for Parliament. The Guards were
called and subsequently fired upon the crowd. Two ladies lost portions of their
wigs, several were “deprived of their eye-brows” and one woman had her cork
rump shot off.
But
perhaps no story was more outrageous than the one which appeared on October 4, 1785
in The Morning Post. A lady
reportedly fell into the Thames and was saved from drowning by—you guessed it—her
cork rump. (You can read the entire article at Prinny's Taylor.)
Eventually,
the cork rump faded in popularity, replaced by the Grecian silhouette and
empire gowns of the Regency. (Check out Two Nerdy History Girls for their blog
about Those Bumless Beauties, 1788.)
But
as the saying goes, you can’t keep a good thing down. The exaggerated tush returned
mid-19th Century in the form of the Victorian bustle.
Resources:
The Observer; The Town and Country Magazine VIII for
the Year 1776; London, p.650